View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Contextual Inquiry | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Domain Modeling Domain Context Map |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 45-60 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Domain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






