View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 1-2 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 4-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
