methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Purposedifferent
When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-5 Tage60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
5-30Nutzertraffic5-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All