View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 90-180 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 5-30 | 4-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






