View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing | ![]() Product Discovery Learning Card |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 1-2 Tage | 25-40 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | Based on research question | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Learning Card with evidence and next action |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | Information architectureNavigationFindability | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






