View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  UX Research Customer Journey Mapping |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 2-4 h | 2-8 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | 4-10 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | JourneyServiceService design | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
