methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen1-2 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-10 Kunden10-30Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Paper illustration of Riskiest Assumption Test with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Riskiest Assumption Test