View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test | ![]() Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | Nutzertraffic | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






