View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 5-15 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | 3-20 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
