View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Architecture C4 Model |  Team Design Team API |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 1-4 h | Half day initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | 1-5 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Team API Document |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
