View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 60-120 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
