View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing | ![]() UX Research Usability Testing | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h je Session | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Based on research question | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Usability Issues, Severity List, Recommendations | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | ValidationUXPrototype | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






