View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs) |  Product Discovery Wizard of Oz Test |  Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification. | When a new experience would still be too expensive to automate for real, it simulates the outcome behind the scenes. It checks user reaction and value before the technology disappears. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional | 2-10 Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | Designers, developers as users, and facilitation | 5-20 Nutzer | 1-5 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions | Prototype Learnings, Manual Effort Notes, Risk List | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric |
Tags1 shared | ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks | PrototypeValidationMVP | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
