View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-15 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | ROAM Board, Owner List | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement |
Tagsno overlap | SensemakingDecisionRationale | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
