View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 60-120 min | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals | Leverage Map, Action Strategy |
Tagsno overlap | SensemakingDecisionRationale | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
