View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Interview | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 5-12 Interviews | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






