View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations ALPEN Method | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min daily | 15-45 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | 1-3 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatsame | Async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






