View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping | ![]() Business Strategy GAP Analysis | ![]() Facilitation Storytelling |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | When an insight needs to have an effect, storytelling translates dry facts into a comprehensible development. It combines context, tension, and consequence into a form that people remember and pass on more easily. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-3 h | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Narrative Outline, Key Message, Story Arc |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | CommunicationNarrativeStakeholdersFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






