methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Ivy Lee Method
Operations
Ivy Lee Method
Purposedifferent
When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.With a restless workday full of too many open items, the method creates radical simplicity. It directs attention to a short sequence instead of a broad, still-open field.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 h5-15 min5-10 min daily
Participantsdifferent
4-123-201
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistDaily Priority List, Completion Notes
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
PrioritizationProductivityExecution
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for Eat the Frog
Operations
Eat the Frog
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of Power-Interest Grid with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Facilitation
Power Interest Grid