methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Paper notes move from an inbox to action, project and calendar collections.
Operations
Getting Things Done
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLow
Timedifferent
20-45 min1-2 h Setup, laufend30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1213-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Lessons learned, Action items, Event summaryAction Lists, Project List, Review RoutineStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
LearningOperationsImprovement
ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review