View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 45-90 min | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-10 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
