View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Agile Planning Poker |  Decision Making Wideband Delphi |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | A single opinion rarely holds up for planning when the future is genuinely uncertain. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as an Estimate Range, Assumption Log, and Expert Consensus Notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 2-5 min je Item | 1-4 h or multiple rounds |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-9 | 4-12 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Estimate Range, Assumption Log, Expert Consensus Notes |
Tags1 shared | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | EstimationExpertsForecasting |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
