View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation | ![]() Agile Planning Poker | ![]() Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 2-5 min je Item | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-9 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | AgileDiscoveryDelivery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






