View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Operations After-Action Review |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 1-2 Tage | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 10-50 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | LearningOperationsImprovement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
