View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation | ![]() Business Strategy GAP Analysis | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 1-3 h | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






