View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 2-8 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 5-12 Interviews | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
