View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Interview | ![]() Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min pro Story | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 5-12 Interviews | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






