View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth A/B Testing |  Architecture C4 Model |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 1-4 h | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 1-5 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
