View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations A3 Problem Solving | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Operations Learning Review |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-5 | 1-3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






