View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 3-12 | 8-80 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | FacilitationDialogueLarge group |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
