View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 20-500+ | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
