View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 3-8 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
