View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Agile Sprint Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 20-60 min | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 1 | Scrum Team |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Improvement actions, Team agreements |
Tags1 shared | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
