View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 20-60 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 1 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | KnowledgeMappingRisk |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
