methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Purposedifferent
When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMedium
Timedifferent
45–75 min20-45 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
Team members involved1-88-80
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesDiscussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker