A decision circumstance and learning goal are bounded.
Jobs to Be Done
A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.
Prerequisite
What needs to be finished first
People with recent relevant experience are available; consent and data handling are clear.
Follow-up and cross-interview comparison are planned.
Preparation
What needs to be ready before start
Open interview guide, event and source note template, recruitment planning and secure storage.
An interviewer and optional note-taker; research ownership coordinates selection and synthesis. Seek varied cases in a small study.
Capture current beliefs about jobs and solutions. Define the decision context and prepare a neutral guide focused on the last concrete experience.
Typically 45–60 minutes per interview plus immediate synthesis. Recruitment, multiple interviews and synthesis span multiple days; there is no universal sample quota.
Explain purpose and data handling. Begin with a narrative prompt, reconstruct the timeline together and trace each interpretation to a concrete statement.
Core question
The one question this method answers
What progress is the person trying to make in a particular circumstance, and which forces shape the decision?
Flow
Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall
Jobs to Be Done examines what people or organizations seek to accomplish in particular circumstances. This guide uses qualitative, story-based interviews about a recent real decision; a job is neither a customer role nor a requested feature.
JTBD research note: progress in a circumstance
Fictional teaching example
This guide uses a qualitative, story-based JTBD lens on concrete decisions and circumstances. ODI / Outcome-Driven Innovation is a separate operationalized variant and is not conflated with this interview approach.
Circumstance and trigger
What concrete circumstance set the decision in motion?
Fictional: A household is planning a repair and realizes it lacks the right drill.
Decision timeline
What happened from the first thought through search, choice and early use?
Fictional: Alex first asks friends, then checks a local tool library and eventually reserves a tool. No real interview took place.
Forces and alternatives
What pulled toward the new option, pushed away from the old situation or made switching uncertain? Which habit kept the person with the old behavior?
Fictional: Repeated unsuccessful requests are push; local availability is pull; concern about tool condition is anxiety; borrowing from friends is a habit.
Job hypothesis
What progress is the person trying to make in this circumstance?
Fictional: “When a one-off repair comes up, I want reliable access to a tool without having to buy and store it.”
Outcomes and open questions
How does the person judge success, what evidence is available and what remains to learn?
Fictional: Availability and a suitable collection time may be criteria. Both hypotheses need checking in further real cases.
All statements are fictional. The example illustrates interview questions, not real customer insight. Do not generalize a job from a single story.
- 1
Change
Choose a concrete decision and circumstance

Goal
The inquiry starts with a recent real decision rather than general opinions.
Inputs for this step
- Research question
- Recruitment criteria for people with a relevant decision experience
Actions
- Bound the decision and time period.
- Recruit people who recently adopted, switched or deliberately retained a solution.
- Clarify consent, privacy and note handling.
Output
Concrete decision scenario
Circumstance · decision · time
Quality check
Can the participant recall a concrete decision rather than a hypothetical intention?
Pitfall
Interviews ask only why people like a concept. Reconstruct the last concrete event and separate general opinions from experienced actions.
Timing: About 20 minutes of preparation; recruitment is additional.
- 2
Timeline
Reconstruct the decision story

Goal
An event sequence reveals circumstances and triggers, not just retrospective explanations.
Inputs for this step
- Interview guide with open narrative prompts
- Consent and note-taking approach
Actions
- Ask the participant to recount the last concrete event chronologically.
- Probe for timing, actions, people, alternatives and questions.
- Separate the decision from later use; reference quotes and observations.
Output
Timeline of traceable events
Event · timing · statement/evidence · open question
Quality check
Can each interpretation be traced to a reported event or quote?
Pitfall
The interviewer fills memory gaps with their own assumptions. Leave gaps open and make timing uncertainty explicit.
Timing: About 45–60 minutes per interview.
- 3
Job and forces
Understand progress, forces and desired outcomes

Goal
The job expresses progress in context without reducing it to a product request.
Inputs for this step
- Timeline and related statements
- Evidence about prior solutions and circumstances
Actions
- Identify triggers and limits of the previous situation.
- Separate expected progress from anxieties or habits around a new option.
- Derive desired functional, social and emotional progress from what was said.
Output
Job hypothesis and influencing factors
Circumstance · progress sought · forces · evidence
Quality check
Does the job hypothesis describe progress in a concrete circumstance? Are functional, social and emotional interpretations sourced?
Pitfall
The job is phrased as a customer role or requested feature. Phrase the progress and circumstance; record products and solutions separately as options.
Timing: Briefly after each interview; synthesize across the research round.
- 4
Synthesis
Review the job hypothesis and next research

Goal
The result informs further discovery without claiming universal prevalence.
Inputs for this step
- Notes from several relevant accounts
- Segment and circumstance criteria
Actions
- Compare events and similar struggling situations across accounts.
- Record counterexamples and differing circumstances.
- Phrase a job hypothesis, open questions and suitable next research.
Output
Provisional job, evidence base and learning plan
Job hypothesis · evidence · differences · next question
Quality check
Does the sample include different cases and counterexamples? Are limits to transferability documented?
Pitfall
A small qualitative round is presented as a prevalence or market estimate. Report findings as qualitative learning and assess quantitative questions with suitable research.
Timing: Several interviews over multiple days; no fixed sample target.
Artifact
What comes out at the end
Sketch: what the artifact looks like
Research collection with question, selection criteria, dated interview notes, timeline, sources, provisional job hypotheses, counterexamples and open questions.
Store interview code, date, recruitment criterion and guide version. Keep contact details separate. Link statements to timestamps or notes and apply suitable anonymization.
- Interview notebook with event timeline
- Audio recording only with informed consent
- Synthesis board that separates statement, interpretation and evidence
jtbd-working-template.md
Plan interviews about concrete switching and decision circumstances, including synthesis.
Jobs to Be Done: Worksheet
Question
To be confirmed
Desired outcome
To be confirmed
Scope
Conduct a JTBD interview round Time: Multiple interviews over multiple days; about 45–60 minutes per interview
Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.
Preparation for this scope
Method setup
- Materials: Open interview guide, event and source note template, recruitment planning and secure storage.
- Roles: An interviewer and optional note-taker; research ownership coordinates selection and synthesis. Seek varied cases in a small study.
- Advance information: Capture current beliefs about jobs and solutions. Define the decision context and prepare a neutral guide focused on the last concrete experience.
- Overall time needed: Typically 45–60 minutes per interview plus immediate synthesis. Recruitment, multiple interviews and synthesis span multiple days; there is no universal sample quota.
- Setup: Explain purpose and data handling. Begin with a narrative prompt, reconstruct the timeline together and trace each interpretation to a concrete statement.
Prepare for the work steps
Change: Choose a concrete decision and circumstance
- Research question
- Recruitment criteria for people with a relevant decision experience
Timeline: Reconstruct the decision story
- Interview guide with open narrative prompts
- Consent and note-taking approach
Job and forces: Understand progress, forces and desired outcomes
- Timeline and related statements
- Evidence about prior solutions and circumstances
Synthesis: Review the job hypothesis and next research
- Notes from several relevant accounts
- Segment and circumstance criteria
JTBD research note: progress in a circumstance
Circumstance and trigger
What concrete circumstance set the decision in motion?
...
Decision timeline
What happened from the first thought through search, choice and early use?
...
Forces and alternatives
What pulled toward the new option, pushed away from the old situation or made switching uncertain? Which habit kept the person with the old behavior?
...
Job hypothesis
What progress is the person trying to make in this circumstance?
...
Outcomes and open questions
How does the person judge success, what evidence is available and what remains to learn?
...
Blank worksheet: collect a concrete decision story. Keep events, statements, interpretations and questions distinct. Form a job hypothesis only after comparing cases.
Sources: Christensen Institute
Change: Choose a concrete decision and circumstance
Expected artifact: Concrete decision scenario
Circumstance · decision · time
Entry:
...
- Can the participant recall a concrete decision rather than a hypothetical intention?
Timeline: Reconstruct the decision story
Expected artifact: Timeline of traceable events
Event · timing · statement/evidence · open question
Entry:
...
- Can each interpretation be traced to a reported event or quote?
Job and forces: Understand progress, forces and desired outcomes
Expected artifact: Job hypothesis and influencing factors
Circumstance · progress sought · forces · evidence
Entry:
...
- Does the job hypothesis describe progress in a concrete circumstance?
- Are functional, social and emotional interpretations sourced?
Synthesis: Review the job hypothesis and next research
Expected artifact: Provisional job, evidence base and learning plan
Job hypothesis · evidence · differences · next question
Entry:
...
- Does the sample include different cases and counterexamples?
- Are limits to transferability documented?
Open questions and next steps
...
Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/jtbd/run-sheet
Example output
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.
jtbd-beispiel.md
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional teaching example: A tool for a one-off repair
All details are invented. No interviews or real customer statements exist.
Circumstance: A repair is coming up; the household lacks a suitable tool.
Fictional timeline: Alex asks friends, then looks for a local tool library and reserves a tool after checking availability.
Progress sought: Complete the repair without permanently buying and storing a rarely used tool.
Possible forces: repeated unsuccessful requests (push), local lending service (pull), concern about condition (anxiety), prior borrowing from friends (habit). These categories are prompts for interpretation, not evidence by themselves.
Job hypothesis: “When a one-off repair comes up, I want reliable access to a tool without having to buy and store it.”
Open question: Does this progress recur across similar households and circumstances? This qualitative sketch says nothing about prevalence or market size.
Pitfalls
Recognize symptoms and steer against them
Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow
- Choose a concrete decision and circumstanceInterviews ask only why people like a concept.View in phase
- Reconstruct the decision storyThe interviewer fills memory gaps with their own assumptions.View in phase
- Understand progress, forces and desired outcomesThe job is phrased as a customer role or requested feature.View in phase
- Review the job hypothesis and next researchA small qualitative round is presented as a prevalence or market estimate.View in phase
Choose a concrete decision and circumstance
Interviews ask only why people like a concept.
Reconstruct the last concrete event and separate general opinions from experienced actions.
Reconstruct the decision story
The interviewer fills memory gaps with their own assumptions.
Leave gaps open and make timing uncertainty explicit.
Understand progress, forces and desired outcomes
The job is phrased as a customer role or requested feature.
Phrase the progress and circumstance; record products and solutions separately as options.
Review the job hypothesis and next research
A small qualitative round is presented as a prevalence or market estimate.
Report findings as qualitative learning and assess quantitative questions with suitable research.
Stop criteria
When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach
Finished the method guide?
Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.

