methodatlas
Method guideProduct Discovery

Jobs to Be Done

A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.

ComplexityMedium
Time1-3 Wochen
Participants5-12 Interviews
FormatWorkshop + async
MaturityCanonical
Plan the research
01

Prerequisite

What needs to be finished first

Complete firstResearch question

A decision circumstance and learning goal are bounded.

Abstract or hypothetical questions do not yield a reconstructable story.
Complete firstAccess and consent

People with recent relevant experience are available; consent and data handling are clear.

Recall and selection limit the transferability of qualitative findings.
Complete firstTime for synthesis

Follow-up and cross-interview comparison are planned.

Individual stories must not be reported as representative prevalence.
02

Preparation

What needs to be ready before start

Materials

Open interview guide, event and source note template, recruitment planning and secure storage.

People / roles

An interviewer and optional note-taker; research ownership coordinates selection and synthesis. Seek varied cases in a small study.

Pre-read

Capture current beliefs about jobs and solutions. Define the decision context and prepare a neutral guide focused on the last concrete experience.

Time needed

Typically 45–60 minutes per interview plus immediate synthesis. Recruitment, multiple interviews and synthesis span multiple days; there is no universal sample quota.

Setup

Explain purpose and data handling. Begin with a narrative prompt, reconstruct the timeline together and trace each interpretation to a concrete statement.

03

Core question

The one question this method answers

What progress is the person trying to make in a particular circumstance, and which forces shape the decision?

04

Flow

Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall

Jobs to Be Done examines what people or organizations seek to accomplish in particular circumstances. This guide uses qualitative, story-based interviews about a recent real decision; a job is neither a customer role nor a requested feature.

JTBD research note: progress in a circumstance

Fictional teaching example

This guide uses a qualitative, story-based JTBD lens on concrete decisions and circumstances. ODI / Outcome-Driven Innovation is a separate operationalized variant and is not conflated with this interview approach.

Circumstance and trigger

What concrete circumstance set the decision in motion?

Fictional: A household is planning a repair and realizes it lacks the right drill.

Decision timeline

What happened from the first thought through search, choice and early use?

Fictional: Alex first asks friends, then checks a local tool library and eventually reserves a tool. No real interview took place.

Forces and alternatives

What pulled toward the new option, pushed away from the old situation or made switching uncertain? Which habit kept the person with the old behavior?

Fictional: Repeated unsuccessful requests are push; local availability is pull; concern about tool condition is anxiety; borrowing from friends is a habit.

Job hypothesis

What progress is the person trying to make in this circumstance?

Fictional: “When a one-off repair comes up, I want reliable access to a tool without having to buy and store it.”

Outcomes and open questions

How does the person judge success, what evidence is available and what remains to learn?

Fictional: Availability and a suitable collection time may be criteria. Both hypotheses need checking in further real cases.

All statements are fictional. The example illustrates interview questions, not real customer insight. Do not generalize a job from a single story.

Sources: Christensen Institute

  1. 1

    Change

    Choose a concrete decision and circumstance

    Goal

    The inquiry starts with a recent real decision rather than general opinions.

    Inputs for this step

    • Research question
    • Recruitment criteria for people with a relevant decision experience

    Actions

    • Bound the decision and time period.
    • Recruit people who recently adopted, switched or deliberately retained a solution.
    • Clarify consent, privacy and note handling.

    Output

    Concrete decision scenario

    Circumstance · decision · time

    Quality check

    Can the participant recall a concrete decision rather than a hypothetical intention?

    Pitfall

    Interviews ask only why people like a concept. Reconstruct the last concrete event and separate general opinions from experienced actions.

    Timing: About 20 minutes of preparation; recruitment is additional.

  2. 2

    Timeline

    Reconstruct the decision story

    Goal

    An event sequence reveals circumstances and triggers, not just retrospective explanations.

    Inputs for this step

    • Interview guide with open narrative prompts
    • Consent and note-taking approach

    Actions

    • Ask the participant to recount the last concrete event chronologically.
    • Probe for timing, actions, people, alternatives and questions.
    • Separate the decision from later use; reference quotes and observations.

    Output

    Timeline of traceable events

    Event · timing · statement/evidence · open question

    Quality check

    Can each interpretation be traced to a reported event or quote?

    Pitfall

    The interviewer fills memory gaps with their own assumptions. Leave gaps open and make timing uncertainty explicit.

    Timing: About 45–60 minutes per interview.

  3. 3

    Job and forces

    Understand progress, forces and desired outcomes

    Goal

    The job expresses progress in context without reducing it to a product request.

    Inputs for this step

    • Timeline and related statements
    • Evidence about prior solutions and circumstances

    Actions

    • Identify triggers and limits of the previous situation.
    • Separate expected progress from anxieties or habits around a new option.
    • Derive desired functional, social and emotional progress from what was said.

    Output

    Job hypothesis and influencing factors

    Circumstance · progress sought · forces · evidence

    Quality check

    Does the job hypothesis describe progress in a concrete circumstance? Are functional, social and emotional interpretations sourced?

    Pitfall

    The job is phrased as a customer role or requested feature. Phrase the progress and circumstance; record products and solutions separately as options.

    Timing: Briefly after each interview; synthesize across the research round.

  4. 4

    Synthesis

    Review the job hypothesis and next research

    Goal

    The result informs further discovery without claiming universal prevalence.

    Inputs for this step

    • Notes from several relevant accounts
    • Segment and circumstance criteria

    Actions

    • Compare events and similar struggling situations across accounts.
    • Record counterexamples and differing circumstances.
    • Phrase a job hypothesis, open questions and suitable next research.

    Output

    Provisional job, evidence base and learning plan

    Job hypothesis · evidence · differences · next question

    Quality check

    Does the sample include different cases and counterexamples? Are limits to transferability documented?

    Pitfall

    A small qualitative round is presented as a prevalence or market estimate. Report findings as qualitative learning and assess quantitative questions with suitable research.

    Timing: Several interviews over multiple days; no fixed sample target.

05

Artifact

What comes out at the end

Sketch: what the artifact looks like

Jobs to Be Done · Switching ForcesSituation, gewünschter Fortschritt und Wechselkräfte produktunabhängig sichtbar machen
Jobs to Be DoneDas Visual zeigt bisherige Lösung, Job Statement, gewünschten Fortschritt und die vier Wechselkräfte Push, Pull, Anxiety und Habit.Nachfrage über Fortschritt und Wechselkräfte verstehenMenschen wechseln nicht wegen Features, sondern weil Push, Pull, Anxiety und Habit einen Fortschritt ermöglichen oder blockieren.treibende WechselkräftebremsendeWechselkräfteSwitch-TriggerhireverstärktziehtbremstOutcomeBisherige LösungExcel, Workaround,GewohnheitJob StatementWenn Situation, möchte ich Fortschritt, damit OutcomeGewünschter Fortschrittweniger Aufwand, mehrSicherheitPushaktueller SchmerzPullneue Lösung ziehtAnxietyRisiko beim WechselHabitTrägheit des AltenDesired Outcomesmessbare Fortschrittskriterien statt Featurewünsche
Form

Research collection with question, selection criteria, dated interview notes, timeline, sources, provisional job hypotheses, counterexamples and open questions.

Versioning / ownership

Store interview code, date, recruitment criterion and guide version. Keep contact details separate. Link statements to timestamps or notes and apply suitable anonymization.

Tool alternatives
  • Interview notebook with event timeline
  • Audio recording only with informed consent
  • Synthesis board that separates statement, interpretation and evidence

jtbd-working-template.md

Plan interviews about concrete switching and decision circumstances, including synthesis.

Jobs to Be Done: Worksheet

Question

To be confirmed

Desired outcome

To be confirmed

Scope

Conduct a JTBD interview round Time: Multiple interviews over multiple days; about 45–60 minutes per interview

Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.

Preparation for this scope

Method setup

  • Materials: Open interview guide, event and source note template, recruitment planning and secure storage.
  • Roles: An interviewer and optional note-taker; research ownership coordinates selection and synthesis. Seek varied cases in a small study.
  • Advance information: Capture current beliefs about jobs and solutions. Define the decision context and prepare a neutral guide focused on the last concrete experience.
  • Overall time needed: Typically 45–60 minutes per interview plus immediate synthesis. Recruitment, multiple interviews and synthesis span multiple days; there is no universal sample quota.
  • Setup: Explain purpose and data handling. Begin with a narrative prompt, reconstruct the timeline together and trace each interpretation to a concrete statement.

Prepare for the work steps

Change: Choose a concrete decision and circumstance

  • Research question
  • Recruitment criteria for people with a relevant decision experience

Timeline: Reconstruct the decision story

  • Interview guide with open narrative prompts
  • Consent and note-taking approach

Job and forces: Understand progress, forces and desired outcomes

  • Timeline and related statements
  • Evidence about prior solutions and circumstances

Synthesis: Review the job hypothesis and next research

  • Notes from several relevant accounts
  • Segment and circumstance criteria

JTBD research note: progress in a circumstance

Circumstance and trigger

What concrete circumstance set the decision in motion?

...

Decision timeline

What happened from the first thought through search, choice and early use?

...

Forces and alternatives

What pulled toward the new option, pushed away from the old situation or made switching uncertain? Which habit kept the person with the old behavior?

...

Job hypothesis

What progress is the person trying to make in this circumstance?

...

Outcomes and open questions

How does the person judge success, what evidence is available and what remains to learn?

...

Blank worksheet: collect a concrete decision story. Keep events, statements, interpretations and questions distinct. Form a job hypothesis only after comparing cases.

Sources: Christensen Institute

Change: Choose a concrete decision and circumstance

Expected artifact: Concrete decision scenario

Circumstance · decision · time

Entry:

...

  • Can the participant recall a concrete decision rather than a hypothetical intention?

Timeline: Reconstruct the decision story

Expected artifact: Timeline of traceable events

Event · timing · statement/evidence · open question

Entry:

...

  • Can each interpretation be traced to a reported event or quote?

Job and forces: Understand progress, forces and desired outcomes

Expected artifact: Job hypothesis and influencing factors

Circumstance · progress sought · forces · evidence

Entry:

...

  • Does the job hypothesis describe progress in a concrete circumstance?
  • Are functional, social and emotional interpretations sourced?

Synthesis: Review the job hypothesis and next research

Expected artifact: Provisional job, evidence base and learning plan

Job hypothesis · evidence · differences · next question

Entry:

...

  • Does the sample include different cases and counterexamples?
  • Are limits to transferability documented?

Open questions and next steps

...

Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/jtbd/run-sheet

06

Example output

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.

jtbd-beispiel.md

Concrete filled scenario, fictional example

Fictional teaching example: A tool for a one-off repair

All details are invented. No interviews or real customer statements exist.

Circumstance: A repair is coming up; the household lacks a suitable tool.

Fictional timeline: Alex asks friends, then looks for a local tool library and reserves a tool after checking availability.

Progress sought: Complete the repair without permanently buying and storing a rarely used tool.

Possible forces: repeated unsuccessful requests (push), local lending service (pull), concern about condition (anxiety), prior borrowing from friends (habit). These categories are prompts for interpretation, not evidence by themselves.

Job hypothesis: “When a one-off repair comes up, I want reliable access to a tool without having to buy and store it.”

Open question: Does this progress recur across similar households and circumstances? This qualitative sketch says nothing about prevalence or market size.

07

Pitfalls

Recognize symptoms and steer against them

Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow

  1. Choose a concrete decision and circumstanceInterviews ask only why people like a concept.View in phase
  2. Reconstruct the decision storyThe interviewer fills memory gaps with their own assumptions.View in phase
  3. Understand progress, forces and desired outcomesThe job is phrased as a customer role or requested feature.View in phase
  4. Review the job hypothesis and next researchA small qualitative round is presented as a prevalence or market estimate.View in phase
08

Stop criteria

When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach

Participants cannot recall a concrete event: refine recruitment or the prompt.
The discussion becomes feature evaluation or abstract future planning: return to the actual story.
The job hypothesis is bound to one solution: restate desired progress in context.
Prevalence, market size or causal impact is needed: complement qualitative learning with suitable quantitative or observational research.
Consent, participation conditions or secure storage are unclear: resolve them before interviewing.

Finished the method guide?

Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.