View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-15 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | ROAM Board, Owner List | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
