View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile WSJF | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-6 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






