View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-120 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-10 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
