View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation World Café |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 60-180 min | 15-45 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 12-100+ | 1-10 | 20-500+ |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
