View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Working Agreements | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-6 | 1-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






