View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Working Agreements |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 5-20 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-20 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | EstimationEffortRisk | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
