View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Working Agreements | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All | ![]() UX Design Design Studio |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 10-20 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 4-100+ | 3-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | SketchingCollaborationIdeation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






