View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 2-3 h | Mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 3-8 | 2-6 researchers plus sample |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
