methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a participant using a prototype while an observer takes notes beside a highlighted usability issue.
UX Research
Usability Testing
Paper illustration of Double Diamond with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Double Diamond
Purposedifferent
When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down.For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement.
Complexitysame
MediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h je SessionWochen bis Monate
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question3-12
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Usability Issues, Severity List, RecommendationsProblem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase
Tagsno overlap
ValidationUXPrototype
ProcessDivergenceInnovation
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

A paper-based illustration representing Design Sprint with its core stages and visible working result.
Innovation
Design Sprint
Design Thinking as a learning loop: an observation notebook, a focused problem statement, different idea sketches, a cardboard prototype and user-test notes. Feedback leads to new understanding.
Innovation
Design Thinking
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview