methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a participant using a prototype while an observer takes notes beside a highlighted usability issue.
UX Research
Usability Testing
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for Contradiction Analysis.
Innovation
Contradiction Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h je Session60-90 min60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question4-102-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Usability Issues, Severity List, RecommendationsProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentContradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ValidationUXPrototype
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

A paper-based illustration representing Design Sprint with its core stages and visible working result.
Innovation
Design Sprint
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Design Thinking as a learning loop: an observation notebook, a focused problem statement, different idea sketches, a cardboard prototype and user-test notes. Feedback leads to new understanding.
Innovation
Design Thinking