methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Purposedifferent
When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-45 min1-3 Wochen5-15 min
Participantsdifferent
3-305-12 Interviews3-20
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer InsightsJob Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListRanked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationCoachingLearning
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of Opportunity Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Scoring
Paper illustration of Product Kata with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Product Kata