methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Purposedifferent
When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-45 min5-15 min10-20 min je Frage
Participantsdifferent
3-303-206-50
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer InsightsRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes
Tags1 shared
FacilitationCoachingLearning
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
LearningDialogueFacilitation
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion