View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 0.5-2 Tage | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 4-12 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationFindability | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






