View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  UX Research Card Sorting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 20-40 min pro Story | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 3-6 | Based on research question |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationFindability | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | Information architectureNavigationStructure |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
